Bridge Course : John Dryden : Essay On Dramatic Poesie :
I’m khushi parmar, a postgraduate student at the department of English mkbu.This blog has been prepared as part of an academic task given by the Head of the Department of English (MKBU), Professor Dr. Dilip Barad Sir.
Introduction:
John Dryden (1631–1700) is often regarded as one of the most important literary figures of the Restoration period and is frequently referred to as the “father of English criticism” as well as the first official Poet Laureate of England. He was a poet, playwright, translator, and critic whose works shaped the literary taste of late 17th-century England.
Born on 9 August 1631 in Aldwincle, Northamptonshire, Dryden was educated at Westminster School and Trinity College, Cambridge, where he gained a solid grounding in the classics, which later influenced his literary and critical writings. His career flourished during the Restoration of Charles II in 1660, a time when English theatre reopened after being banned during the Puritan rule.
![]() |
| John dryden |
John dryden as a poet, critic and translator...
John Dryden (1631–1700) was the dominant literary figure of the Restoration period, celebrated as a poet, critic, and translator. As a poet, he perfected the heroic couplet and gave English verse clarity, balance, and elegance, seen in works like Annus Mirabilis and his famous odes such as Alexander’s Feast. As a critic, he is called the father of English literary criticism, with An Essay of Dramatic Poesy (1668) marking a milestone in English critical thought. Here, he evaluated the ancients, moderns, French, and English dramatists with remarkable fairness. As a translator, Dryden rendered Virgil, Ovid, and Juvenal into vigorous and polished English, blending fidelity with creativity. Together, these roles establish him as the true spokesman of the Restoration Age.
The video explains why John Dryden is called the Father of English Criticism. It talks about his role as a neo-classical critic, meaning he followed classical rules of literature (inspired by Greek and Roman writers) but also adapted them to suit English drama. It also mentions Dryden’s ideas about what a play should be.
In Dryden’s Essay of Dramatic Poesy, four characters—Crites, Eugenius, Lisideius, and Neander—take part in a debate about drama. They discuss whether ancient plays or modern ones are better, whether French drama or English drama is superior, and whether plays should be written in rhyme or blank verse. In the end, Neander, who speaks for Dryden, defends English drama. He says that while classical rules are useful, English plays are richer and more lively because they allow more freedom and creativity.
The video also talks about how French drama influenced Restoration theatre. French plays were admired for their beauty and strict following of classical rules, and many English critics liked them. Dryden also respected the order and polish of French drama, but he did not think they should replace the richness and variety of English plays. The video explains that this debate was not only about literature—it also reflected the politics and culture of 17th-century England, where people were concerned about national identity and pride. Dryden’s comparison of French and English drama is therefore more than a study of style; it is his way of saying that English theatre should respect tradition but also stay true to its own unique character.
The video also shows an interesting change in Dryden’s career. In the essay, his character Neander supports writing plays in rhyme. But later, Dryden wrote his famous tragedy All for Love completely in blank verse (unrhymed lines). This shows that Dryden’s views on drama were not unchanging. With time, he may have felt that blank verse, with its natural flow and deeper emotional power, was better for serious stories full of strong feelings. So, the debate is not just about writing style—it also shows how a writer’s ideas can grow and change through experience.

